Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 19:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Thamblyok - uploaded by Thamblyok - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good composition, quality and colours, however the damage to the wing is a bit of a shame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 16:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African_Barbets)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Atudu (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing colors. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 12:44:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
- Info created by Antonio Thomás Koenigkam Oliveira - uploaded by Simtegrity - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Image quality is fine. I don't understand the reason for black and white though, especially when the sky is so featureless and lacking in contrast. I like these pictures looking upwards at skyscrapers and tall buildings but I think this one lacks a strong composition and that the little bits of streetlamps poking in at the edges of the frame detract from the image. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
- Info A risky nomination and I don't know what you'll think to this. But there is something about the composition that I find really interesting and I like it more the longer I look at it. I think it's the warm and inviting light, the leading lines from the sweep of the road and the brickwork, the rich colours, and the contrast between the almost aggresive regularity of the brickwork and the repeating patterns in the roofs, compared with the somewhat eclectic architecture of the house. Anyway, it's subtle, but this is IMO a really good example of how to shoot a street in a small town. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I like the composition, I find it arresting. —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. At the first glance I am not that happy about some of the elements (e.g. the walls at the right), but the short telephoto perspective (70mm) combines all them to a really convicing composition. It’s often very difficult to find satisfying compositions in small city streets, and this is indeed a greaat example. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Where to focus ? Nothing special for FP. --Mile (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The overall picture is attractive to me, also because the trees are bare.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
- Info I love the golden winter lighting in this photo of a lesser known religious building. Created by Саня Новиков - uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support according to the nomination statement. // Welcome back, Cmao20! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great find – I’m happy we have you back here as nominator, Cmao20! – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had some laptop trouble plus a major contract at work. But I never mean to leave, it just sort of happens. Will always come back after a break. Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:32:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while this is a pretty motif and a good photograph, it is tilted and some way short of FP sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 20:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I am sorry too, Mounir. The ISO is high, the shutter speed is more than ample for a 50mm lens, but f/32 creates a lot of diffraction, and its amplified by the APS-C sensor on the camera. The birds are not in sharp focus, nor are the people or the homes. The colors look wonderful. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose WB, rotation. --Mile (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: in view of above comments, there is no chance to be a FP. Yann (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 19:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - uploaded by KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC) - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the shadows and the light. Subtle and pretty. Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:40:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info create, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 12:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- An aerial view of Kounos, Mani, Greece, a village populated with tower houses, some up to five stories high, built by families to protect them from thieves or hostile families. Support -- C messier (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent overview of that picturesque village, and the sun illuminates it like a spotlight. – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 09:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
- Info High altar at the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, around 1490. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even the windows are not (partially) burned.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 19:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
- Info In the center is the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico, on the left you can see the historic boats of the Adriatic Sea, the only floating museum in Italy located on the oldest and most evocative part of the Leonardo's canal port of Cesenatico. This Museum Is the custodian of the maritime history of sailing boats coming from the north of the Adriatic Sea. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, colorful -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Chernilevsky.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to say no to JWST Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, especially the red center that reminds me of a crystal. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original photograph, there are some artifacts introduced by removing the background: the tail shows a double contour, what seems a casting defects has been removed from the right-hand leg, and three cusps are present below the neck. I added three notes about them. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Reminded me of this, pretty hilarious! --Gnosis (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#France
- Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 15:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Peulle. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Colors seem a little too saturated and overall, the image appears dark. Consider lightening to increase detail in the mid-tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 22:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Please check the crop at the left, some background is visible --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, it is hard to recognize on a white background, I have fixed it.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC) - Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be a bit sharper, but v picturesque and lovely Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this photo and feel it should be highlighted. I saw the light coming through the window and thought, "WOW, those rays of light are beautiful." But then I moved up to the top right corner and noticed how light pollution prevents the details of the wall fresco from being visible (it looks washed out). I think this can be fixed in Lightroom (something opposite to the process of correcting vignetting). --Wilfredor (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful religious space. I could quibble about a couple of things e.g. the top crop but I am willing to accept them as part of the compromises needed to capture this lovely space in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Request The perspective is a bit distorted, I don't know if it's beacause the building is not exactly symmetrical or because the camera was leaning a bit more to the left than it should. Can this be corrected? --Lynx1211 (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seeing candlebars ane around, you did a lot "looking for center". I dislike Saint above is cut, instead you could crop candlebears and save Saint. Distortion. --Mile (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very high resolution, good focus, feeling of space with this large background -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, a clear FP.--Peulle (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Woah. This is one of the best images of an African antelope I've ever seen. Everything is timed to perfection. Huge congratulations to the photographer of this high-caliber, educational, and valuable piece of art. Wolverine XI 15:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support of course Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture. Sharp focus, even lighting, the perspective works well as the grasslands rise in the background to the horizon, which presents a nice juxtaposition with the cream colored grasses against the blue. If there were anything to adjust, perhaps a slight crop from the right to make the subject appear to have a little more distance in the direction the subject is heading. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
- Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Something different --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Visibly heavily JPEG artefacted (see her neck and chin - compression artefacts are v obvious). Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The grayscale works so well with this portrait and adds drama. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done portrait, matches the character of some of her songs very well. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not FP-standards in my heavily biased opinion. Wolverine XI 15:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- all the opinions are welcome :) Wilfredor (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and please do not lower the highlights on the snow - snow should be this blindingly white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The higher perspective works here to really add depth to the image. The dog doesn't seem to be afraid of heights. The sun on the dog's face provides warmth in an otherwise cold image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- ((o)) Good dog picture but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
((o))
intentionally? (With(())
your vote has no defined meaning.) Just asking, because in the end somebody must count the votes … – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: Do you want to cast an oppose vote or did you use
- Support Beautiful environmental portait of a proud creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Dragon? --Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Missing location --A.Savin 15:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, where was this picture taken? Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ukraine, Vinnytsia. Exotic animals exhibition -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Exotic animals exhibition"? That's not nice... --A.Savin 20:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? We have many FP from zoos. In this photo the background look like natural, not distracting, the animal's behavior is natural -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I presume that in these temporary or touring exhibitions, they treat the animals worse than in a zoo. --A.Savin 17:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stricking image (please improve description and add a location category). --C messier (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If you didn't say that you shot this at an exhibit, I wouldn't think it was shot through glass. Well exposed for an animal in a tank, good detail. It provides the viewer with a unique perspective of a snapper. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exquisite Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support well done! The jagged texture of the rocks contrasts with the cotton of the water. Well composed and executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene, and I love both the large area with water and islands in the background and tiny details like the things at the tree in the foreground (what’s hanging there?). – Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fishing nets! Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not everything was spectacular at this time, and not all the craftmen were prodigies like Michael Angelo :-) Ordinary architectural element in my view (also for the period). Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Am I mispercieving this or is the image tinted yellow? Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I can possibly make the photo a little less yellow.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2024(UTC)
- @Henrysz: I have reduced the yellow color, Thanks for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Basile this time. Good QI and nice colours but IMO not outstanding enough for FP, an interesting motif but far from an extraordinary one. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Superb subject, great interplay of light and shadows, but I must agree with Basile that the top crop is very tight. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Stricking image but the out of focus portion on the upper right is too distracting. Sorry. Also, IMHO too strong contrast (there are both burnt whites and pitch blacks) and a bit small. --C messier (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cool abstract and was worth a try, but a bit small and not convinced by the strong contrast and blown highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Awesome action shot Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support So many of your photos have a really picturesque, painterly touch and this is no exception. Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Coordinates and English description should be added. --Milseburg (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I want to support. I just found an issue to fix bottom rigth, see note. --Milseburg (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Milseburg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice - an old photo that really feels like you can step inside it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice document of the old Paris, before Haussman. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cute and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support So cute El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. Nice colours, composition + sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with respect to the author who has presented at least a high quality QI, but I don't think 'considering it was taken from a cell phone' is the right attitude. Either it's good enough for FP or it's not, we shouldn't make allowances for the quality of equipment. I love the motif but I'm not convinced by the level of detail at this relatively small resolution (less than 6 megapixels) and I don't think the bottom crops in the corners are perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Cmao20
- Thank you for your feedback. I acknowledge the points you've made about the quality. If the image has the potential to become a featured picture, I commit to returning to the location to capture it again using a Nikon camera. As for the cropping, Here is an overview of the building. Please share any suggestions you might have for a better crop. Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good for me considering high resolution and high pixel level detail. I feel like if we say this one isn't good enough, we are getting close to mandating focus-stacking for this kind of image. There is a bit of colour noise but it's not enough to put me off too much. Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and clearly FP to me. Very sharp on the building. Lovely light and colours. I think there is possibly a point in that this is the duller side of the castle to photograph and a lot of it is featureless wall. But still very good and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are too many visible artificial transitions between sharp and blurry areas. Probably from merging two images or two layers (original and sharpened). I would be OK with using software to adjust sharpness, but the transitions are too artificial. Also, there is a lot of color noise on the castle and roof, probably created by increasing the sharpness. The light makes the picture too flat and not very interesting.
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the original more balanced. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful golden light. Per Radomianin and Cmao20 I prefer the wide version. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the [internal mosaic of the apse] where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Would be support if I'd not seen the original but it's just better. In the original we have the gentle sweep across the scene with the trees getting larger and drawing the eye towards the basilica, plus the carved animal figures all pointing in the same direction that give a sense of movement as we look across the frame. The alternative lacks any of this and feels comparatively static. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but interesting and high quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin, but the framing is a bit too large in my view Still better too large than too tight :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool minimalism. Very sharp and good composition. I agree with Basile about the framing but not enough to oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 16 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Tue 17 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Thu 19 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Fri 20 Sep → Wed 25 Sep Sat 21 Sep → Thu 26 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 12 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Wed 25 Sep Tue 17 Sep → Thu 26 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Fri 27 Sep Thu 19 Sep → Sat 28 Sep Fri 20 Sep → Sun 29 Sep Sat 21 Sep → Mon 30 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.